Regularization
🎯 Purpose¶
Use this decision card to choose between Ridge, Lasso, and ElasticNet regression based on your dataset structure, modeling goals, and need for feature selection or multicollinearity control.
🧠 1. Method Comparison¶
Method | Penalty | Primary Effect |
---|---|---|
Ridge | L2 (squared sum) | Shrinks coefficients, keeps all |
Lasso | L1 (absolute sum) | Shrinks + selects (sparse output) |
ElasticNet | L1 + L2 hybrid | Balance between shrink + select |
✔️ All methods reduce overfitting and handle multicollinearity.
📌 2. When to Use Each¶
Use Case | Choose... |
---|---|
High multicollinearity, keep all features | Ridge |
Need automatic feature selection | Lasso |
Many correlated predictors + want balance | ElasticNet |
✔️ ElasticNet is ideal when Lasso is too aggressive and Ridge retains too much noise.
⚙️ 3. Tuning Considerations¶
Param | Notes |
---|---|
alpha |
Higher = stronger regularization |
l1_ratio (ElasticNet) |
0 = Ridge, 1 = Lasso, 0.5 = balance |
# ElasticNet example:
ElasticNet(alpha=0.1, l1_ratio=0.5)
✔️ Always scale your features before regularization.
🔍 4. Output Expectations¶
Method | What You'll See |
---|---|
Ridge | All features retained, small coefficients |
Lasso | Some coefficients driven to zero (selected model) |
ElasticNet | Shrunk + selected balance, some near-zero coefficients |
✅ Decision Checklist¶
- [ ] Multicollinearity detected or suspected
- [ ] Need feature selection? → Lasso or ElasticNet
- [ ] Need only shrinkage? → Ridge
- [ ] All features scaled
- [ ] Tuning (
alpha
,l1_ratio
) cross-validated
💡 Tip¶
"Use Ridge to stabilize, Lasso to simplify, and ElasticNet to balance the two."