Clustering Model Selection
π― Purpose
Use this card to choose the most appropriate clustering algorithm β KMeans, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN, or Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) β based on your datasetβs structure, goals, and interpretability needs.
π¦ 1. When to Use Each Model
Scenario |
Best Model |
You want fast, scalable clustering with k known |
β
KMeans |
You want automatic outlier detection and non-spherical clusters |
β
DBSCAN |
You want DBSCAN but with better performance on variable densities |
β
HDBSCAN |
You want soft clustering with probability estimates |
β
GMM |
π§ͺ 2. Model Assumptions & Strengths
Model |
Shape Assumed |
Strengths |
KMeans |
Spherical, equal size |
Fast, simple, scalable |
DBSCAN |
Arbitrary shape, same density |
Detects outliers, no k needed |
HDBSCAN |
Arbitrary, variable density |
Better noise handling, soft labels |
GMM |
Elliptical (Gaussian) |
Soft clustering, density modeling |
β οΈ 3. When to Avoid
Situation |
Avoid... |
High-dimensional sparse data |
DBSCAN (slow, unreliable) |
Need explainability |
GMM (less intuitive) |
You donβt know k and canβt guess |
KMeans, GMM (require predefined clusters) |
Clusters are non-Gaussian or non-convex |
GMM (biased results) |
β
Decision Checklist
- [ ] Are clusters expected to be well-separated and spherical? β Try KMeans
- [ ] Do you expect noise or arbitrary shapes? β Try DBSCAN or HDBSCAN
- [ ] Is cluster density varied across space? β Prefer HDBSCAN
- [ ] Do you need probabilistic (soft) clustering? β Use GMM
- [ ] Will you tune
k
? β Use KMeans or GMM
π‘ Tip
βStart with KMeans for speed. Switch to DBSCAN or HDBSCAN for shape. Reach for GMM when you want probabilities β or elegance.β